Sunday, March 17, 2013

Prompt Revision #3: Open Prompt #4


1979. Choose a complex and important character in a novel or a play of recognized literary merit who might on the basis of the character's actions alone be considered evil or immoral. In a well-organized essay, explain both how and why the full presentation of the character in the work makes us react more sympathetically than we otherwise might. Avoid plot summary.

                In the play Death of a Salesman by Arthur Miller, Willy Loman is seen through different viewpoints.  Throughout the play readers feel anger and frustration towards Willy Loman due to his immoral and evil actions, but at other times readers feel guilt and maybe even sympathy towards him.  Willy Loman is a complex character who can evoke the desired emotion from readers when appropriate.  Readers feel anger towards Willy when they find out about his affair and his constant lack of authority when it comes to his son Biff, but readers feel sympathy when they learn about Willy’s situation, and his immense sense of pride.

                At the beginning of the play readers find out that Willy Loman has been having “flashbacks” that readers and his sons blame on Willy just being crazy.  As the play goes on Linda Loman explains that Willy’s salary has been taken away and he’s solely working on commission, Willy has been traveling hundreds of miles per week, and he is suicidal.  At this point Arthur Miller evokes feelings of sympathy from the readers, and also from Willy’s sons who now see Willy in a new way.  Miller conveniently added this piece of information right after readers find out Willy is having an affair, so they don’t feel like he’s only a bad guy.

                Adultery is definitely seen as an immoral action, and Willy Loman is guilty for cheating on his wife with another woman while he is out on his business trips.  Readers find out that this affair may be more than just for fun when the woman says “I’ll put you right through to the buyers.”  This means that Willy could be using her just to get ahead in the business world, and that would just cause more anger towards Willy.  Linda’s kind and understanding attitude towards Willy angers readers even more, because Willy is taking Linda for granted, and going off to fool around with another woman.

            Throughout the play readers learn that Will has a great sense of pride and doesn’t want his family to see him as a failure.  This idea is emphasized when Willy lost his job, and wouldn’t accept a new job from Charley.  At this point readers may be frustrated with Willy, but at the same time they would feel sympathy, and some readers may even be able to relate to what Willy’s going through.

                Lastly Willy has no sense of morals when it comes to his favorite son; Biff.  Biff is a thief and doesn’t care about school, but Willy has no sense of authority, because he believes Biff will get ahead in the real world due to his looks and likeability.  At the beginning of the play Biff steals a football in one of Willy’s flashbacks and when Willy finds out he says “Sure, he’s gotta practice with a regulation ball, doesn’t he?”  This just shows that Willy doesn’t have a good sense of morals and believes Biff can do no wrong; this action evokes anger from readers because Willy isn’t acting as the authority figure, but rather as Biff’s friend.  Also when Biff tells Willy that his math teacher is only failing him because he doesn’t like Biff because Biff imitated him in front of the whole class Willy just asks if the other students thought if it was funny.  This proves that Willy doesn’t discipline his sons for their bad behavior, but just wants them to be well liked.

                Arthur Miller did a great job creating the complex character of Willy Loman who manages to be evil, yet still have readers cheering him on due to the sympathy they feel.  Willy Loman is a very different character who manages to be loved and hated at the same time.

Sunday, March 10, 2013

Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead summary/analysis


Author – Tom Stoppard

Setting – There are three main locations…

1.      A no man’s land – this is significant because this idea of uncertainty is not only portrayed by the location but by Rosencrantz and Guildenstern as well, they have no idea why they are there and what they are supposed to do.

2.      Court of Denmark – this is significant because this is the part of the play where they are sucked into the world of Hamlet

3.      Boat – this is significant because being on the boat represents death, where you are all alone in a large body of water

Characters

1.      Rosencrantz – He can be seen as the goofy sidekick who does whatever he is told and really doesn’t think for himself.  Rosencrantz (Ros) is a nicer personality than Guil, and he is more likeable by the people they meet on their journey.  Once in a while Ros does say something out of character that’s wise or profound.

2.      Guildenstern – Guil is the leader in the duo and he is a realist.  Guil may not be much smarter than Ros, but is trying to prove that he’s smart by talking about well-known scientific theories.  Guil scares readers because he is realistic and reveals a scary truth that everyone will end up dying and that nobody serves a true purpose in the world.  Guil is also not seen as the best friend, because he has no loyalty and this is seen when he thought it was okay to send Hamlet to his death.

3.      The Player – He is the leader of the tragedians, and when readers first meet him he doesn’t give off the best first impression, because he talks about rape and prostitution.  He feels that life is like being an actor in a play where someone else has already determined your fate, so there’s no point trying to change it.  Overall the player is obsessed with death and that’s what the majority of his lines talk about

Plot Summary

1.      The play starts out with Ros and Guil flipping coins and it keeps landing on heads and Ros keeps pocketing the money

2.      Guil then starts trying to understand this phenomenon and brings in the law of probability, which he explains incorrectly

3.      Then Ros and Guil remember that a messenger came and sent for them, but they don’t remember why

4.      Then the tragedians come along, and offer to act out anything or do any sexual activities for money

5.      Guil challenges the player to a coin toss, and using wits and logic Guil wins, then the player walks away upset

6.      All of a sudden Ros and Guil are put into a scene from Hamlet where Claudius and Gertrude ask Ros and Guil to spy on Hamlet and find out what’s bothering him

7.      The Ros and Guil decide to play questions as a way to practice talking to Hamlet, but it just leads to misunderstandings, and is seen as humorous

8.      Then Hamlet walks in, interrupting the game of questions and acts normal and warm towards his childhood friends

9.      Hamlet tells his friends that he’s not crazy, but Ros and Guil still don’t think they got all the information they were supposed to

10.  Then the players walk in and Hamlet asks them to perform The Murder of Gonzago

11.  The players and Ros and Guil start to talk and the player tells them to stop constantly questioning the situation/life and to calm down

12.  Then the player talks about what the play is about (mimics the situation that Hamlet is in)

13.  Then the three of them start talking about Hamlet and the player tells Ros and Guil that Hamlet is in love with Ophelia

14.  Then Ros and Guil watch the dress rehearsal and here all the events that will happen in the future are acted out, including the fact that Ros and Guil will be hanged

15.  Then Guil gets upset saying that a play cannot reflect death (Stoppard’s voice), but the player disagrees

16.  The next day Hamlet stabs Polonius and Ros and Guil are sent to go talk to Hamlet and try to figure out where he put Polonius’s body

17.  Then readers find out that Ros and Guil have to take Hamlet to England for some unknown reason

18.  The last act opens with Ros and Guil on a boat, and they are arguing about what to do when they get to England

19.  As a result they act out what they will say to the king when they get to England, during this acting out they open the letter they have to give to the king

20.  The letter says that Hamlet will be killed, and Hamlet overhears this so when Ros and Guil are asleep Hamlet exchanges the letter for one that he wrote saying Ros and Guil should get killed instead

21.  Ros and Guil talk about what they should do, and when they reopen the letter they read that it has been changed and it’s sending them to death rather than Hamlet

22.  The next morning pirates invade the boat and they take Hamlet with them

23.  Then Guil stabs the player, and everyone thinks he’s dead, but then he gets up and reveals the dagger used to stab the player was a fake prop

24.  The next scene we see Ros and Guil ready to be hanged, they question what actions have led them to this situation and what their purpose was in the world

25.  The last scene is out of Hamlet where we see everyone in the Court dead and Horatio is speaking

Symbols

1.      The boat represents a world of uncertainty, because Ros and Guil have no control over the boat, they just have to see where the boat takes them

2.      The coins represent the randomness of the world, because the coins defy the rules of probability.  They also represent fate versus chance

3.      The play represents the idea that life is like a play and we have no choice in our fate, we’ll end up wherever we’re supposed to because it’s all predetermined

Themes

1.      Communication because throughout the play Ros and Guil would be having a conversation but each of them were in their own world and that led to a lot of miscommunication and added humor to the play

2.      Isolation because Ros and Guil lived in a world of their own, and they would just pop in and out of scenes from Hamlet, readers would never see  them travel to those places they would just appear

3.      Death because there is the idea that we are all going to die, and there’s also the idea that art can’t accurately describe death, we can only know what it truly is by experiencing it for ourselves

Important Quotes

1.      ROS: What are you playing at?
GUIL: Words, words. They're all we have to go on

Ø  This quote is important because it shows how desperate these two characters are to find out what their purpose is, and they only have the idea of communication.  This quote emphasizes the theme of communication and misunderstanding.

2.      ROS (he means): Is he dead?
PLAYER: Who knows?
GUIL (rattled): He's not coming back?
PLAYER: Hardly.
ROS: He's dead then. He's dead as far as we're concerned
PLAYER: Or we are as far as he is.

Ø  This shows the uncertainty when it comes to death, and nobody can know what it truly is until they have experienced it.  This quote emphasizes the theme of death, and it shows the many definitions of death as well.

 

 

 

Saturday, March 9, 2013

Response to Course Materials #7

            In the last couple of weeks we have done some more AP essay practice and as much as I hate writing essays I’m glad we are doing them, because it’s helping me answer the “BIG” question of meaning.  I’ve realized that there are many different interpretations for each passage we’re given and made me feel better to hear Holmes say that even if your interpretation is different than what the scorers thought you could still do well as long as you can back up your interpretation with quotes.  I feel like these essays are harder for me because it’s very different from the writing I’ve done in my other English classes, where teachers would encourage a super creative catchy intro.  But hopefully these practices will help me do well on the AP exam.
            We finished Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead, which I’m pretty happy about because I didn’t really like the book.  I think the multiple layers to the book confused me a little bit, but the group discussions definitely helped me understand the book a little more.  I found that the ideas in Hamlet were opposite than the ones presented in Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead.  For example there was the question of identity in Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead, whereas in Hamlet he knew who he was, but is issue was whether or not to take action.  There was also the example of religion, where Hamlet was a Jesus figure, but in Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead there was no God.  I thought these contrasts were interesting, because it took two different takes on one story.
            We are now starting Ceremony, which I’m exited for because the summary of the story sounds interesting.  I liked learning about the history behind the story, and it made me realize how different texts can come across differently depending on the background of the person reading it.